Reading coverage

The 19 supplied document/image files have been fully reviewed within the boundaries recorded below. Assignment context is also recorded. The prototype has received a bounded four-scenario expert review, dedicated visual/access checks and a clickable feedback module. Its main findings record the exact covered states and remaining limits. Full review of supplied content does not imply that missing pages, separate attachments or product behavior have been checked.

The inventory below covers the supplied document folders. Page and row counts describe the supplied content. Word paragraph counts include table cells and blank paragraphs. Spreadsheet rows include headers and may include formatting-only rows.

Other supplied context

• Key Points and the two supplied WhatsApp screenshots: all visible content read. S19 context note. Stakeholder statements are not direct learner research.
• SUNY NCSIM Design Onboarding Pack (25 Oct 2026).zip: all nine file entries were compared with the extracted folder and are byte-for-byte matches. They share those files' review coverage.
• the working prototype: homepage opened in native Arc on October 26, 2026. This supersedes the earlier web-reader access failure. The homepage, catalog and one workshop detail/class-selection state were inspected. Later search/recovery, handoff, visual/access and scenario checks are recorded in S20 and the main findings; this entry preserves the initial orientation history. S20 orientation note.

How to update coverage

For each source, add the link to its source note and record the exact pages, sections, paragraphs/tables, sheet rows, or image areas reviewed. Track text and visual coverage separately where needed. Record comments, hidden content, missing attachments, unreadable text, or diagrams that need a closer look.

Use Not started, Extracted, Partly reviewed, Fully reviewed, or Needs a check. Extraction alone does not count as reading. Before using Fully reviewed, read all content, check the source note against it, verify its links, and resolve or clearly report every coverage gap. A source with unreadable content remains Needs a check.

The RFP excerpt is verified. Both onboarding formats have been read; they share substantive content. The proposal excerpt also matches the full source exactly in text and rendered pages.

Completed reading coverage

• S18: all 103 pages read, including diagrams, image headings, forms, appendices and annotation check. Source note.

• S07: all 20 pages match S18 PDF pages 7–26 in text and rendered images. Excerpt note.

• Temporary extraction files supported reading. They are not the handoff record; source and topic notes are the durable record.

• S01/S02: all body content and four tables / all five PDF pages. Shared note.

• S04: all 22 pages and 21 profiles. Persona note.

• S05: all 11 pages, GL-01–57. Glossary note.

• S06: all four pages and crosswalk/role tables. Map note.

• S09: all text and three diagrams, including visual inspection in Arc. Architecture note.

• S11/S12: all 33/17 transcript pages, timestamps and small speaker-icon images checked. May 21, May 22. The demonstrated deck is not embedded.

• S21: all seven pages of the newly supplied May summary checked against S11/S12. Its three other meetings are known through this compiled account only. What it adds and repeats.

• S13–S16: all four supplied image areas inspected. Cropped boundaries, unknown versions and untested interactions are recorded in screen notes.

• S03: all six worksheets, all populated rows/columns, formulas and cached totals, visibility and auxiliary-content checks. Jira note.

• S17: all 144 supplied pages, tables and 203 unique image objects. Proposal note.

• S08: all 82 pages match S17 PDF pages 15–96. Excerpt note.

• S10: all sections 1–13 and Appendices A–E, extraction units 0–2450, all 263 permission rows and six role columns, five comments, tracked deletions, headers and footers. All 37 PNG assets and five SVG alternatives inspected, including eight embedded SVG image assets. Seven are blank note backgrounds; one carries a catalog validation note. FRD note.

Limits that remain

• The proposal contains 144 supplied PDF pages, printed as pages 2–145 of 170. Unsupplied pages were not read. See S17.
• The RFP references separate attachments not all present in this pack. The FRD also references standalone D-01, D-02, D-03 and D-05 documents that are not supplied. See S18 and S10.
• Some Jira requirement cells are truncated in the export; the full RFP was read separately. The export remains a dated snapshot. See S03.
• The old images are cropped and their exact versions are unknown. The May demonstration's complete visual deck and recording are not supplied. S21 adds a compiled account, but not the original notes for three of its five meetings. See S11–S16, S19 and S21.
• The first focused prototype review is now recorded in Findings, including its May-feedback checklist and exact limits. Full access checks, signed-in roles, registration completion and learner validation remain untested. No accessibility conformance assessment has occurred.

Source fingerprints

These SHA-256 fingerprints identify the files used for this review. A changed fingerprint means the source needs a difference check before earlier coverage is reused. The original 18 files were rechecked against the initial extraction manifest on October 26, 2026. S21 was added and checked separately later that day.